Originally two draft posts, one from 2007, and one a couple months ago. I had been sent this chain letter twice, but decided not to send these to their original addressees, but combine the two response emails into one post. Please to enjoy:
I agree with most of this letter, except:
“Is this the same president who guided the nation in the dark days after 9/11?”
No, this is the same president who told the intelligence community to find information linking Iraq to 9/11 so he could invade the country.
“The president that cut taxes to bring an economy out of recession?”
The economy ebbs and flows; presidents and taxes have little actual causal effect on it. Cutting the death tax doesn’t count, as that tax really applies to rich people.
“Could this be the same guy who has been called every name in the book for succeeding in keeping all the spoiled ungrateful brats safe from terrorist attacks?”
Keeping us safe by invading other countries on false pretenses to serve his own self-interest? I’m sure that will keep us safe.
“Just ask why they tried to allow a murderer like O.J. Simpson to write a book about how he didn’t kill his wife, but if he did he would have done it this way……Insane!”
I’m sorry, I thought this was America, the one with freedom of speech. I’m not condoning the book, but he’s free to express his thoughts however he wants. Besides, aren’t you innocent until proven guilty?
Regardless of individual points of contention, my personal feeling of dissatisfaction (I am not an unhappy person) with this country is with the current presidential administration, particularly its views on foreign policy. I fear that our involvement in a civil war that doesn’t concern us, the way we are playing both sides, will only ensure more attacks on this country. We weren’t attacked because we’re “spoiled brats.” We were attacked because of our constant involvement in the Middle East, and our economic extortion of developing nations.
From John Perkins’ book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man (which I highly recommend):
Today we see the results of this system run amok. Executives at our most respected companies hire people at near-slave wages to toil under inhuman conditions in Asian sweatshops. Oil companies wantonly pump toxins into rain forest rivers, consciously killing people, animals, and plants, and committing genocide among ancient cultures. The pharmaceutical industry denies lifesaving medicines to millions of HIV-infected Africans. Twelve million families in our own United States worry about their next meal. The energy industry creates an Enron. The accounting industry creates an Andersen. The income ratio of the one-fifth of the world’s population in the wealthiest countries to the one-fifth in the poorest went from 30 to 1 in 1960 to 74 to 1 in 1995. The United States spends over $87 billion conducting a war in Iraq while the United Nations estimates that for less than half that amount we could provide clean water, a equate diets, sanitation services, and basic education to every person on the planet.
And we wonder why terrorists attack us?
Don’t get the wrong idea. I love this country, and am grateful that I live in a first world country with all the benefits and rights that I have. I am not opposed to the bravery of soldiers executing their mission, but that’s what it is: a mission. It’s their job. However, the person leading the current charge, their commander-in-chief, is the epitome of what exactly is wrong with this country. A group of out-of-touch rich old guys attempting to become more rich by plundering anything and everything they can while gaining support by using fear against harm and specific groups of people. That is the true definition of terrorism. Look it up.
Complaining about the direction our country is heading is not unpatriotic. It’s what defines our country as a democracy, and a dissenting voice is the definition of patriotism: wanting the best for your country. The beauty of our system is that we don’t have to like our current officials, and can change them out without having an entire governmental coup and throwing this country into chaos and anarchy.
Maybe it’s the fact that I have to defend the decision not to go with McCain (who wants more of the same BS) at my workplace (who are all hardcore christian right-to-lifers) constantly, but I almost feel the need to illustrate: this country, in its current direction, is fucked. Unless something seriously changes soon, we will not be the world’s superpower, we will not be the nation the world looks up to, and we will certainly not be the nation that we all want ourselves to be. George Bush is not our savior; he was a CEO (of a company that was financed with money from Osama bin Laden’s half-brother) before he was a president, and is even less qualified to be president of the United States than Sarah Palin.
Let me clarify: I’m not a liberal by nature, at least in the classical sense. I don’t think the government should be involved in as much of our lives as they are, but the conservative party now is not the traditional conservative. They’re neoconservative, which is a euphemism for “against social programs” and “against equality.” Neoconservative viewpoints hide behind a “God said this, and I know it to be true, therefore it must be true” thought process, which I can’t seem to wrap my head around. Neoconservatism is like traditional liberalism, but without the liberal belief system. They still believe in legislating opinion to protect the citizenry from themselves.
If you believe this country is doing just fine as-is, and that McCain represents a positive future for America, then I am truly saddened. No amount of pleading or convincing on my part will be fruitful. I’d like to tell you about how the GOP lies to its constituency, and how they portray benefits for people making over $250,000 per year as being relevant to normal middle-class citizens, and how their health care plan (which was contrived in the first place by Nixon and Kaiser Permanente) makes you feel like you’re the one at fault is completely screwed up, but honestly…
Nobody listens to somebody who says these things. At the first mention of death tax, health care, or energy concerns, people who listen to the GOP completely shut down and repeat the mantra, “estate tax bad, social welfare bad, offshore drilling good.” I’ve been told that McCain’s policies are good because he’s against taxing working folk, against large corporations, and against “Big Oil”…but what does that mean? Anybody can take a stance against taxing, stealing from, and raping people.
Words don’t mean anything with regard to political rhetoric. Take a look at the record of this country. If you want specific examples, I’ll give them. What I don’t want is another intellectually dishonest conversation about how expressing my issues with this country is unpatriotic, or how Obama is another Hitler, Castro, or other dictator. I don’t want to hear about campaign-trail-soundbites about some exaggeration that Obama made about McCain. I certainly don’t want to hear about how disagreeing with some of these things makes me less of an American.
With that, I’m done discussing politics. I will continue to support Barack Obama until he is elected, but my vote has been cast.